What Is a Quantitative Research Critique?

You will select a quantitative and a qualitative nursingresearch article. Each study’s main components should be summarized. A critiquealso contains comments about the positive and negative aspects of the study andthe report of the study. The critique should be written as concisely aspossible, no longer than 5 pages, typewritten, double-spaced. APA style format. The paper shouldaddress all parts of the report equally, with strengths and weaknesses outlinedwhere appropriate. Where possible, include suggestions for improvement. A copyof the research discussed must be submitted with the assignment. At least oneof the lead authors on each article must be a nurse. Use the research critiqueguide provided by your professor to complete this assignment.
Criteria for Assignments:
QUANTITATIVE RESEARCHCRITIQUE GUIDE
Use the following guide inwriting the critique:
1. Statement of theProblem/Purpose
 Is the problem/purposeclearly stated?
 Is it easy to identify andlocate?
 Is it significant to nursing?
2. Review of Literature
 Is it recent? Five years ornewer?
 Were primary sources ofauthorities or experts used?
 Is it relevant to the statedproblem?
 Does it provide a solid basisfor the study?
3. Conceptual/TheoreticalFramework
 Is there a theoretical orconceptual framework, rationale, and/or map, and (if so) is it appropriate? Ifnot, is the absence of one justified?
 Are key concepts adequatelydefined conceptually?
4. Hypothesis(es) or researchquestion(s)
 Are research questions and/orhypotheses explicitly stated? If not, is their absence justified?
 Are they adequately statedwith clear specification of key variables and the study population?
 Are they placed in thecontexts of a theoretical or conceptual framework?
5. Research Method(s)
 Were appropriate proceduresused to safeguard the rights of study participants? Was the study subject toexternal review by an IRB/ethics review board?
 Was study designed tominimize risk?
6. Research Design
 Does the approach fit thepurpose and hypothesis (es)?
 Was the most rigorouspossible design used, given the purpose of the research?
 Was the number of datacollection points appropriate?
 Did the design minimize biasesand threats to internal construct, and external validity of the study?
7. Population and Sample
 Was the population properlyidentified and described? Was the sample described in sufficient detail?
 Was the best possiblesampling design used to enhance the sample’s representativeness? Were samplebiases minimized?
 Was the sample size adequate?Was a power analysis used to estimate sample size needs?
8. DataCollection and Measurement
 Are theoperational and conceptual definitions congruent?
 Were keyvariables operationalized using the best possible method and with adequatejustification?
 Areinstruments objective? Reliable? Valid?
 Were datacollected in a manner that minimized bias? Was the staff that collected dataappropriately trained?
9. DataAnalysis
 Wereappropriate statistical methods used, given the level of measurement of thevariables, number of groups being compared?
 Is athorough descriptive analysis given?
10.Presentation of Findings/Implications
 Are allhypotheses discussed with findings adequately summarized, with appropriate useof tables and figures?
 Are findingsreported in a manner that facilitates a meta-analysis and with sufficientinformation needed for evidence based practice?
 Were therecommendations for clinical practice and further research reasonable andcomplete?
 Arelimitations presented and adequate?

“Place your order now for a similar assignment and have exceptional work written by our team of experts, guaranteeing you A results.”