Create and Share your Presentation
Your group’s final portfolio will comprise one or more pages in PebblePad where you will showcase your group’s research and findings. The final design and appearance of your portfolio is up to you and the group, but every portfolio should include at least the following elements:
A minimum of two journal articles in your presentation with evidence-based findings
The use of some multimedia to showcase the researched materials

A piece of creative work (e.g., story, poem, artwork, song, video clips) to highlight the theme and/or convey your key message

Here is the peer evaluation rubric for your group project.

Assessment AreaSophisticatedCompetentNot Yet CompetentOrganizationPresentation/Portfolio is clear, logical, and organized. Listener/viewers can follow line of reasoning.Presentation/Portfolio is generally clear and well organized. A few minor points may be confusing.Presentation/Portfolio is haphazard; listener can follow presentation only with effort. Arguments are not clear.Style and use of multimediaPresentation is well designed for audience understanding. The presentation involves good elements for audience engagement.Presentation is adequately put together and the audience could follow the theme of the presentation comfortably.Presentation appears to be hastily put together and not easy for the audience to follow.Scope of the contentExtensive additional research (outside of textbook) is evidentSome additional research (outside of textbook) is included.Very little additional research (outside of textbook) was included in the presentation.Depth of ContentApplications of theory illuminate issues. Contrasting viewpoints and/or cross-cultural perspective (race, ethnicity, gender, socioeconomic status, nationality, etc.) are adequately considered. Listeners gain insights.For the most part, explanations of concepts and theories are accurate and complete. Some helpful applications are included.Little attempt is made to tie theory to practice. Listeners gain little from the presentation.Accuracy of ContentInformation (names, facts, citations etc.) included in the presentation is consistently accurate and well referenced.No significant errors are made. But more direct research evidence is desired.Little reference was provided. Audience must determine what information is reliable.Creative workPowerful and innovative work was presented to highlight the theme and/or convey the group’s key messageEffective work was presented to highlight the theme and/or convey the group’s key messageLimited effort was put into the creative work.Further Discussion (Questions Posted on Discussion Forum)The posted discussion question(s) is interesting, engaging, and thought-provoking.The posted discussion question is relevant to the theme and worth further discussionThe posted question does not generate interest for further discussion
Individual Reflection on Group Work and Annotated Bibliography (5%)

Your reflection should include two components: (1) how you worked together as a group to produce your final presentation and what your individual contribution was; (2) your personal learning and major take-aways from this assignment. The individual reflection should be a maximum of one page in length.

In addition, you are required to submit one entry of an annotated bibliography of research evidence from a primary source that is related to your presentation. This source should be unique to each individual student (i.e., group members cannot submit the same article). Please review the course content explaining annotated bibliographies: 2c. Literature Review and Annotated Bibliography, then consult the Annotated Bibliography Checklist to make sure your annotated bibliography meets the requirements.