Helen Nissenbaum Worst Fears About Privacy Rights Analysis Paper

Privacy
Write a short story in which Nissenbaum’s worst fears about privacy rights have come true. Be sure to depict in your story the following issues: facial recognition technology, privacy in public, and contextual integrity. You may include other issues beyond these three, but I want to at least see that you depicted the issue of facial recognition technology and the main topics from Nissenbaum’s article concerning the right to privacy in public.
Guidelines:
 3-4 pages
 MLA format: 12-point font, Times New Roman, double-spaced, 1-inch margins
 Please only consult the class readings/films and cite using MLA format
o Works cited page + in-text citations (Author ##).
o https://library.csun.edu/egarcia/documents/mlacita”¦
o http://www.easybib.com/
 Avoid using long quotes to fill space
 Be sure to explain all key terms
FILE FORMAT:
Canvas only accepts the following file formats: doc, docx, pdf, txt, and rtf (Google docs and Pages files won’t work). Also, Canvas will not process file names that include special characters or dashes. If Canvas doesn’t accept your file, then I can’t grade it.
ACADEMIC DISHONESTY: Submitting this assignment to Canvas will check for plagiarism and originality through Turnitin.com. Please don’t plagiarize or buy essays online–it’s not worth it. I report all instances of plagiarism to the Honor Council.
If you’re struggling to complete the assignment, then please please please come to office hours so we talk it over. We might clarify confusing things from class, make an outline to get you started, and I’m also open to reasonable deadline extensions.
25.0 ptsExcellent
Clearly introduces the topic, question, or problem Intro/thesis is a map for the argument: what is your claim (thesis), how will you defend this claim, and why is this significant?
20.0 pts
On the way to excellent
Adequate framing of the topic, perhaps slight misrepresentations; Presents a thesis without supporting reasons, unclear why this claim is significant
15.0 pts
Needs Improvement
Imprecise introduction, some irrelevant “page filler,” perhaps off-topic information; thesis is unclear or missing
25.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent
65.0 pts
A
(1) Cogent, insightful analysis of the topic that engages course reading (2) Acknowledges obvious counterexamples and potential weaknesses in the argument (3) Quotes and textual evidence support the main argument, all citations are explained by the author
55.0 pts
B
(1) Good explanation of course material; perhaps some misunderstandings of the course material or a lack of detailed analysis (2) Some contestable claims; needs more explanation and interpretation of central claims to strengthen the overall argument (3) Needs more textual support, perhaps quotes are irrelevant or off-topic; stronger evidence would help to strengthen the overall argument
49.0 pts
C
(1) Inaccurate explanations of course material that misrepresent or weaken the main argument (2) Presents claims without analysis or perhaps with significant inaccuracies (3) A general lack of textual support for main claims
42.0 pts
D
(1) Lacks analysis of main ideas from the reading or class discussion; difficult to understand (2) No textual support or evidence for main claims
0.0 pts
F
(1) No evidence for having read the material; irrelevant analysis or stream of consciousness (2) Did not address the assignment topic
65.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeArgument Form
65.0 pts
A
(1) The argument employs clear claims that are logically supported by relevant evidence to support the main thesis (2) The argument makes claims or interpretations based on course content (3) Each paragraph contains an argument that supports the goals outlined in the thesis
55.0 pts
B
(1) Good argument structure; Some vague reasoning, but generally understandable and uses evidence to support the main thesis (2) Reasoning might be unclear in places; Perhaps some hidden assumptions, unsupported claims, or logical flaws in the argument; Perhaps the counter-argument could be stronger
49.0 pts
C
(1) The main argument is unclear or missing (2) Many unsupported claims or missing steps in the argument (3) The presentation of the material affects the understanding of the main argument
42.0 pts
D
(1) Needs more clarity; Many off-topic claims that don’t support a central thesis; many unsupported claims (2) Main argument is absent or difficult to understand
0.0 pts
F
(1) There are serious structural issues in the main argument that affect comprehension overall; Does not appear to address assignment topic (2) Missing a main argument; Extremely unclear and lacks reasoning for main claims
65.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeFormatting and Citations
20.0 pts
Excellent
Proper length, Double spaced, 1-inch margins; 12 point font, Times New Roman; MLA format; Citations help