The purpose of the Recommendations assignment is to leverage the interview material from Part 1, the literature and theoretical foundations from Part 2, and the learning you have obtained throughout the semester to form feedback to your practitioner from Part 1. This is the scholar-practitioner model which looks to put into application the theories of strategy.
To complete this part you will interview the same leader from Part #1 about your philosophy of strategizing and implementing ideas in their organization, based on your literature review. After the interview, submit a transcript of the questions and answers as an appendix to your integrative paper. Any data collected before IRB approval cannot be used as data in your dissertation but can be included in the literature review as a personal communication citation according to the APA Manual.
For Part #3.b , reflect on your interview and answer the following questions:
What are 3-4 relevant and thoughtful recommendations you can propose to enhance your interviewees effort to strategize and implement solutions in their industry? These recommendations should aim to create positive change, build dynamic capabilities, and enrich their understanding of how to create significant change through collaborative leadership.
Based on your beliefs, values, and experience, what is your personal professional philosophy regarding strategy and implementation practice in this industry?
What are some potential research topics related to strategy and implementation in the context of this organization?
What are some emerging research questions related to strategy and implementation in the context of this organization
1
Part 2 Literature Review Draft
Bryce Fisher
Anderson University
LEAD 625-G01
March 3, 2024
2
Part 2 literature review draft
Introduction
In the realm of sports coaching, the implementation of effective strategies is essential
for achieving success on the field. This paper attempts to address the complex tapestry of
sports coaching by interweaving some peer-reviewed insights to help cast light on the
subtleties of successful strategizing by Coach Taylor. We here try to synthesize such thoughts
in trying to untangle the basic threads in bringing forth the enigma that is successful
strategizing in sports. Effective coaching, it would appear, turns out to be something just shy
of the playbook and, in fact, entails a dynamic interplay of strategic vision, adaptability, and
collaborative synergy. Thus, a look at the following theoretical frameworks and empirical
studies pointing out the strategic underpinnings ascribed to Coach Taylor’s method might be
in order, as useful insights are drawn within the academy by practitioners and researchers.
Dynamic and Holistic Strategy
It should be emphasized that in virtually all applicable literature on sports coaching
today, the role is seen dynamically and holistically – as a compilation of strategic principles,
the essence of which lies in recognizing various aspects of coaching practice. It is worth
mentioning that the mechanisms that give head coaches the lead role in elite teams, such as
the transformational leadership behaviours that are mainly used, were outlined by Maquet
and Stanton (2021). The strategic leadership of Coach Taylor is a systematic and intensive
depicted professional ethos of a made-to-order plan and adaptive leadership. Relating the
theoretical frameworks, including Porter’s Five Forces and the Resource-Based View, to his
practice, it is clear Coach Taylor knows all the industry dynamics all too welltheir perusal
capabilities of organizations. These modes of behaviours are inherently located on the
process side, allowing coaches to successfully brief the players and introduce adaptability and
3
responsiveness as key to the teams culture side. This stresses that strategy should be
adaptable and able to identify advantages in each situation and secure positive outcomes
successfully.
Moreover, Stoetzel and Taylor-Marshall (2022) also insist on the urgency of adopting
change during a practice coaching model. The pivotal success component is the comprehensive
approach to coaching practice, which connects all possible dimensions. This requires
understanding the interdependencies of different facets of coaching, ranging from preparation
of tactics and player development to retaining good team dynamics. Employing a
comprehensive perspective, coaches can cope with the difficulty of sports administration and
are ready to fine-tune their ways to incorporate the new conditions.
According to Burney (2023), this coaching wisdom revolves around an acceptance that
sports coaching is complicated and multi-dimensional. Coaches can put into play ideas from
the literature so that they learn to develop a strategic orientation that incorporates such
characteristics as adaptability, responsiveness, and an awareness of the critical aspects of
coaching. Consequently, such a proactive and motivational approach will make them perfect
at devising and executing team strategies that maximize their chances to win and achieve the
desired objectives.
Continuous Evaluation and Adaptability
Continuous evaluation and adaptability are essential components of effective sports
coaching tactics, as emphasized by research conducted by Gibson and O’Connor (2022) and
Stoetzel and Taylor-Marshall (2022). Athletes in the realm of sports must navigate a
constantly evolving and fiercely competitive environment, often requiring adjustments to
tactics within a 24-hour timeframe. Gibson and O’Connor (2022) highlight the importance of
adaptability in elite coaches, particularly during losing streaks and moments of heightened
performance outcomes. Rather than rigidly adhering to predetermined action models, leading
4
coaches advocate for a flexible approach that allows for on-the-fly adjustments based on both
team dynamics and opponent strategy.
Similarly, Stoetzel and Taylor-Marshall (2022) stress the need for coaches to redefine
their perception of change in coaching practice. They assert that adaptability extends beyond
mere responsiveness to external factors; it involves a fundamental mindset shift that embraces
change as an opportunity for growth and improvement. This shift in mindset fosters a culture
where athletes embrace change positively, viewing it as a chance for evolution and progress.
Additionally, Köningset al. (2021) underscore the importance of continuous evaluation in
adapting coaching strategies effectively. By constantly assessing technical approaches and
identifying areas for improvement, coaches can make informed, evidence-driven decisions
rather than relying solely on intuition.
In conclusion, the iterative process of continuous evaluation and adaptability is crucial
for coaches to ensure their tactics remain relevant and responsive to the dynamic nature of the
sports world. By embracing adaptability and fostering a culture of continuous improvement,
coaches can empower athletes to thrive in ever-changing competitive environments.
The other stuff also shows the additional measure of the iterative compatibility mechanism.
Köningset al. (2021) state that to effectively adapt coaches strategies, coaches must constantly
evaluate technical approaches and specify the areas for improvement. Therefore, these
indicators’ continuous evaluation process helps coaches make fact-based, evidence-driven
decisions rather than intuition and speculation. Coaches may make all the difference by
enabling constant evaluation during their coaching practices to guarantee that their ideas are
up-to-date and reactive to the complex nature of the sports world (Malerba et al., 2016).
Shift in Roles and Perspectives
5
In the career of Coach Taylor, serving as the positional coach and the head coach really
represents a significant point of turning where there is a difference in terms of roles and
mindsets in sports coaching. For instance, the transition experienced here reflects one of the
most popular themes in the sports coaching area, where the representatives of the game
previously restricted to some narrow positions are moving into a broader scope of leadership.
As explained by Burns and Collins (2023), the interdisciplinary aspect of the performance
practices is presented, and the necessity of cooperation and role flexibility in achieving
effective team performance is explained. This idea is reflected in Coach Taylor’s journey of
understanding each position and then becoming a person who heads and guides the entire team
to put together different strategies and stages.
On the other hand, Khan et al. (2023) focus on extracurricular activities as a means of
improving students’ academic performance and involvement. They argue that a shift of
perspective of the youth can be brought about by the activities that they participate in. Likewise,
the coach’s case reinforces the stance that the most compelling view is one that looks at all the
personnel involved as a whole and considers how the dynamics of each one contribute to the
team’s performance. Prior to his relation to the title of head coach, he was accountable for
additional areas, which took a turn from hard skills to team dynamics on the whole game
strategy and analysis of opponents. The literature mentions that it is an absolute necessity for
coaches to be able to accept the changing roles and perspectives; as this is rejected, it becomes
a stumbling block to their leadership success. According to Al Shuraiaan et al. (2024), when
coaches take into account the interdependency of various aspects of an organization, they are
able to blend their opinions. Therefore, creativity and adaptability can be maximized. The
sensational life that Coach Taylor follows demonstrates a great case of how accepting the other
side’s point of view and understanding can lead to influential changes and performances in
sports coaching. During that time, he is allowed to make valid deductions as to the essence of
