HC310 Herzing Week 4 HIPAA Employee Training Program Presentation
Question Description
Due Sunday by 11:59pm
Points 100
Submitting a text entry box, a website url, a media recording, or a file upload
Instructions:
Part One: Training Plan
You are to create a privacy training plan as the healthcare manager of a facility. Your training plan should include:
Timeliness of training (when training should be completed by for new hires)
Who is the trainer?
How long training will be (how many days and how long each day)?
The method of training (in person, online, etc”¦)
Who should have training?
How you will verify attendance of trainees?
This is part one of the project. The training plan must be submitted as a one page APA formatted document.
Part Two: Create the Training
For part two of the assignment, you will create a PowerPoint presentation used for the training. Examples of scenarios your employees would encounter, regarding each content item listed below, should be included. Follow proper formatting for a PowerPoint (at least 22 point font, do not overcrowd slides – about 7 lines to a slide). Use the notes section to indicate the script for each slide. The presentation should be a minimum of 10 slides including a title slide and reference slide.
The content of the training should be as follows:
What is HIPAA and how does it affect me as an employee?
What is the Notice of Privacy Practices, who gets a copy and what does it cover?
What is protected health information?
How do patients obtain copies of records?
What is the purpose of a confidentiality agreement and why do I have to sign one as an employee?
What is included in a confidentiality agreement?
This is part two of the project. The training presentation must be a minimum of 10 slides with speaker notes and be submitted as a PowerPoint presentation.
Part Three: Create a Confidentiality Agreement
For part three of the assignment, you will create a one-page confidentiality agreement using the guidelines that you just presented in your training. The agreement must contain appropriate spacing and signature lines. The confidentially agreements must be submitted as a word document.
Estimated time to complete: 3 hours
Rubric
HC310 Unit 4 Assignment – Privacy Training Plan
HC310 Unit 4 Assignment – Privacy Training Plan
Criteria Ratings
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAnalysis of Knowledge
20.0 pts
Level 5
Connects and extends knowledge (facts, theories, etc.) from one’s own academic study/field/discipline to civic engagement and to one’s own participation in civic life, politics, and government.
18.0 pts
Level 4
Analyzes knowledge (facts, theories, etc.) from one’s own academic study/field/discipline making relevant connections to civic engagement and to one’s own participation in civic life, politics, and government.
16.0 pts
Level 3
Begins to connect knowledge (facts, theories, etc.) from one’s own academic study/field/discipline to civic engagement and to one’s own participation in civic life, politics, and government.
14.0 pts
Level 2
Begins to identify knowledge (facts, theories, etc.) from one’s own academic study/field/discipline that is relevant to civic engagement and to one’s own participation in civic life, politics, and government.
12.0 pts
Level 1
There Is some evidence that knowledge is identified (facts, theories, etc.) from one’s own academic study/field/discipline that is somewhat relevant to civic engagement and to one’s own participation in civic life, politics, and government.
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDefines Content
20.0 pts
Level 5
Demonstrates the ability to construct a clear and insightful problem statement/thesis statement/topic statement with evidence of all relevant contextual factors.
18.0 pts
Level 4
Demonstrates the ability to construct a problem statement, thesis statement/topic statement with evidence of most relevant contextual factors, and problem statement is adequately detailed.
16.0 pts
Level 3
Begins to demonstrate the ability to construct a problem statement/thesis statement/topic statement with evidence of most relevant contextual factors, but problem statement is superficial.
14.0 pts
Level 2
Demonstrates a limited ability in identifying a problem statement/thesis statement/topic statement or related contextual factors.
12.0 pts
Level 1
Demonstrates the ability to explain contextual facts but does not provide a defined statement.
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeRelationship to Research
20.0 pts
Level 5
Evaluates materials for scholarly significance and relevance within and/or across the various disciplines, evaluating them according to their contributions and consequences.
18.0 pts
Level 4
Examines materials for scholarly significance within and/or across the various disciplines to explore contributions in relation to important questions.
16.0 pts
Level 3
Uses materials in the context of scholarship to develop a foundationof disciplinary knowledge