Case About KIPP Houston Internal Operations & Public Schools Analysis Paper

Read KIPP Houston Public Schools, Case 9, pages C-97 through C-111.(I have uploaded the case materials in the form of word.）And please submit TurnItIn results.
For this case analysis, you should prepare a written analysis of 3 to 5 pages that uses the text and other credible sources as appropriate. Your paper should have 1″³ margins, be double spaced, and use APA formats for
topic and subtopic headings
citations
references
Your case must minimally address the following issues / questions:
Summarize the organizational strengths and core competencies which distinguish KIPP Houston from its competitors. Does the new regional structure advance or interfere with the goals of the organization?
What are the weaknesses of KIPP Houston’s internal operations? Compare the organization’s performance to the achievements of its competitors. What steps have been taken to manage its problem areas?
Describe the factors in the external environment which affect the charter organization’s ability to meet its objectives. Discuss KIPP Houston’s current expansion goals.
Describe and consider Ali’s strategic posture on the major issues facing KIPP Houston. Based on your analysis, do you agree with her judgment? What additional recommendations can you make to guide the organization’s strategy and actions?
The total score of this case study is 30 points. Here are the scoring points.
Kipp Houston Public Schools
Criteria
Ratings
Pts
Analysis of internal strengths and core competencies
6.0 pts
Superior: Exceeds expectations and thoughtfully assesses the potential impact of the expanding regional structure.
5.0 pts
Proficient: Analysis thoroughly describes the relevant strengths and core competencies which distinguish KIPP Houston from its competitors.
4.0 pts
Competent: Analysis includes significant strengths and core competencies which distinguish KIPP Houston from its competitors.
2.0 pts
Needs Improvement: Analysis excludes some of the relevant strengths and core competencies which distinguish KIPP Houston from its competitors.
6.0 pts
Analysis of internal weaknesses
6.0 pts
Exceeds expectations, fully exploring and recognizing competitor achievements which impact KIPP’s success in the marketplace.
5.0 pts
Analysis thoroughly describes KIPP Houston’s internal weaknesses and demonstrates a full understanding of the steps being taken to overcome them.
4.0 pts
Analysis includes significant weaknesses of KIPP Houston’s internal operations and the steps being taken to manage these weaknesses.
2.0 pts
Analysis excludes some of the weaknesses of KIPP Houston’s internal operations and/or the steps being taken to manage these weaknesses.
6.0 pts
Analysis of external environmental conditions
6.0 pts
Exceeds expectations and provides an outstanding critique of the organization’s current expansion goals.
5.0 pts
Analysis fully and accurately describes the external factors which affect the organization’s ability to meet its objectives.
4.0 pts
Analysis describes external factors which affect the organization’s ability to meet its objectives.
2.0 pts
Analysis fails to describe some of the external factors which affect the organization’s ability to meet its objectives
6.0 pts
Strategic intent and recommendations
7.0 pts
Exceeds expectations and offers extraordinary suggestions to guide the organization’s strategy and actions.
6.0 pts
Response fully considers Ali’s strategic posture on major issues facing KIPP Houston, citing her experience, training, and body of results to credit her judgment.
5.0 pts
Response considers Ali’s strategic posture on major issues facing KIPP Houston.
3.0 pts
Response does not fully consider Ali’s strategic posture on major issues facing KIPP Houston.
7.0 pts
Grammar, Writing, APA Format
5.0 pts
Information is appropriately sequenced with topical headings and subheadings. Language use, grammar, spelling, and punctuation are at an appropriate graduate level, with no errors. Uses paragraph form with topical sentences that are supported by the remainder of the paragraph, and effective transitions. Writing is clear, concise, and in correct voice and tense. Correct application of APA format. NO errors in citations and references.
4.0 pts
Information is appropriately sequenced with topical headings. Language use, grammar, spelling, and punctuation are at an appropriate graduate level. Uses paragraph form with topical sentences that are supported by the remainder of the paragraph. Writing is clear and concise. Somewhat correct application of APA format. Two to three errors in citations and references.
3.0 pts
There is some order to the information with some heading usage. Presentation has two to four misspellings or grammar errors, or two or three word use errors. Uses paragraph form but sentences within the paragraph may not be related. Somewhat correct application of APA format. Four to si