Assessment 3 Information
Subject Code: MBA603
Subject Name: New Venture Capital Raising
Assessment Title: Angel Investing (equity Crowdfunding)
Assessment Type: Presentation
Choose an item.: 10 Minutes (+/-10%)
Weighting: 20%
Total Marks: 100
Submission: In Class; upload slide deck on MyKBS
Due Date: In Class Week 8
Your Task The purpose of Assessment 3 is to analyse two different investment opportunities that are currently on equity crowdfunding / investment platforms and determine the company that you would invest in. The two companies to evaluate will be sent to you in Week 7 via the Subject Announcements (portal).
Assessment Description
Learning Outcome 4: Create recommendations arising from a comprehensive risk assessment.
Assessment Instructions In week 8 (in class), your workshop facilitator will divide you into teams of 3 – 4 people. Your team is required to create a 10- minute presentation on the pros and cons of each company from an investor point of view and then decide which one your team would invest in (NOTE: there is no requirement that you have to invest in either of the companies). Give justification as to why you are interested in investing in the company (or companies). Understandably, you may not have all the information you want from a due diligence perspective, but based on the information you have been given, analyse each opportunity. Some of the aspects to take into consideration are, but not limited to:
The capability and motivation of the management team
Market demand
Production is scaled up as planned
Competition
Intellectual Property (e.g, is it defendable?)
Liability and litigation
Company has sufficient capital
Existing customers are able and willing to pay
Success Probability Each person on the team will be expected to speak in the presentation. For this assessment, there is a minimum of six (6) references which can include journals, reputable websites, government papers, etc.
Page 2 Kaplan Business School Assessment Outline
Submission mode Face to Face Students You will have 90 minutes in-class to prepare with your team. Your team will have to 10 minutes to
present. Your workshop facilitator will stop you at 10 minutes whether you are finished or not. Online Students You will have 90 minutes in-class (via Zoom) to prepare your 10-minute presentation. Your workshop facilitator will stop your presentation at the 10 minute mark whether you are finished or not.
Important Study Information
Academic Integrity Policy KBS values academic integrity. All students must understand the meaning and consequences of cheating, plagiarism and other academic offences under the Academic Integrity and Conduct Policy. What is academic integrity and misconduct? What are the penalties for academic misconduct? What are the late penalties? How can I appeal my grade? Click here for answers to these questions: http://www.kbs.edu.au/current-students/student-policies/.
Word Limits for Written Assessments Submissions that exceed the word limit by more than 10% will cease to be marked from the point at which that limit is exceeded.
Study Assistance Students may seek study assistance from their local Academic Learning Advisor or refer to the resources on the MyKBS Academic Success Centre page. Click here for this information.
http://www.kbs.edu.au/current-students/student-policies/
https://elearning.kbs.edu.au/course/view.php?id=1481
Page 3 Kaplan Business School Assessment Outline
Assessment Marking Guide
Criteria F (Fail) 0%-49%
P (Pass)
50%-64%
CR (Credit)
65%-74%
D (Distinction)
75% – 84%
HD (High Distinction)
85%-100%
Mark
Assessment Content (Subject Specific) OUT OF 80 MARKS
Introduction Introduction was not included. Introduction was vague. Introduction covered basic overview.
Very good introduction with clear overview.
Excellent introduction with clear and thorough overview.
/ 10
Company #1 Evaluation No evaluation and due diligence of the company.
Vague evaluation and due diligence of the company.
Good evaluation and due diligence of the company. More depth needed.
Very good evaluation and due diligence of the company.
Excellent evaluation and due diligence of the company. Very thorough analysis with justifications.
/ 30
Company #2 Evaluation No evaluation and due diligence of the company.
Vague evaluation and due diligence of the company.
Good evaluation and due diligence of the company. More depth needed.
Very good evaluation and due diligence of the company.
Excellent evaluation and due diligence of the company. Very thorough analysis with justifications.
/ 30
Recommendations / Justification / Conclusion
Recommendations and conclusions were not addressed / included.
Recommendations and conclusions were included but vague.
Recommendations and conclusions were sufficiently addressed.
Very good recommendations and conclusions though could have been clearer.
Excellent and thorough recommendations and conclusions.
/ 10
Structure Format and Presentation (Consistent across all courses) OUT OF 20 MARKS
Answer clearly and logically presented
Writing style is unclear; lacks logical flow and structure
Writing style lacks some clarity; some flaws in logical flow and structure
Writing style is mostly clear; Generally logical flow and structure
Answer presented mostly clear and logical
Answer presented very clear and logical.
/ 4
Appropriate theory and research used to answer question posed
Inappropriate and outdated theory and research used
Adequate theory and research used; Some research dated. Met minimum standards,
Good theory and research used. Current. Could have had more in-depth research.
Very good and in-depth theory and research used; current and thorough.
Excellent and current theory and research used; Depth of research exceeded expectations
/ 4
Correct academic writing style used, including correct spelling, grammar and punctuation
Non-academic writing style, lacks clarity and has no flow. No structure. Many spelling and grammatical errors.
Writing style is non-academic though is clear; minor flow and structure issues. Spelling/ grammatical errors.
Academic writing style is clear; good flow, some structure issues. Some spelling or grammatical errors.
Clear academic writing style with very good flow and structure. Minor spelling or grammatical errors.
Academic writing style is very clear with sound flow and structure. No spelling or grammatical errors.
/ 4
Format of answer consistent with question requirements and KBS guidelines
Format of answer does not follow KBS guidelines of the question requirements
Format of answer adequately meets question requirements; KBS guidelines inconsistent
Format of answer meets question requirements and KBS guidelines; some errors
Format of answer consistent with question requirements & KBS guidelines; a couple of errors
Format of answer exceeds question requirements and KBS guidelines; no errors
/ 4
In-text referencing and reference list follows Harvard style and consistent with KBS guidelines
None or very few sources are acknowledged. Does not follow Harvard style nor KBS guidelines.
Acknowledged few sources in text and reference list. Few citations & references follow Harvard style. KBS guidelines rarely adhered to.
Acknowledged some sources in text and reference list. Inconsistent use of Harvard style. Some KBS guidelines adhered to.
Acknowledged most sources in text and reference list. Most citations and references follow Harvard style. Most KBS guidelines adhered to.
Acknowledged all sources in text and reference list. All citations and references follow Harvard style. All KBS guidelines adhered to.
/ 4
Comments:
/100
Applied Sciences
Architecture and Design
Biology
Business & Finance
Chemistry
Computer Science
Geography
Geology
Education
Engineering
English
Environmental science
Spanish
Government
History
Human Resource Management
Information Systems
Law
Literature
Mathematics
Nursing
Physics
Political Science
Psychology
Reading
Science
Social Science
Home
Blog
Archive
Essay
Reviews
Contact
google+twitterfacebook
Copyright © 2019 HomeworkMarket.comHOMEWORKMARKET.COM YOUR HOMEWORK ANSWERSHomeworkMarket
Home.Homework Answers.
Help.
Log in / Sign up
Assignment 3
profile
dee5758
MBA603T1_2020Assessment3_v1.pdf
Home>Business & Finance homework help>Assignment 3
Page 1 Kaplan Business School Assessment Outline
Assessment 3 Information
Subject Code: MBA603
Subject Name: New Venture Capital Raising
Assessment Title: Angel Investing (equity Crowdfunding)
Assessment Type: Presentation
Choose an item.: 10 Minutes (+/-10%)
Weighting: 20%
Total Marks: 100
Submission: In Class; upload slide deck on MyKBS
Due Date: In Class Week 8
Your Task The purpose of Assessment 3 is to analyse two different investment opportunities that are currently on equity crowdfunding / investment platforms and determine the company that you would invest in. The two companies to evaluate will be sent to you in Week 7 via the Subject Announcements (portal).
Assessment Description
Learning Outcome 4: Create recommendations arising from a comprehensive risk assessment.
Assessment Instructions In week 8 (in class), your workshop facilitator will divide you into teams of 3 – 4 people. Your team is required to create a 10- minute presentation on the pros and cons of each company from an investor point of view and then decide which one your team would invest in (NOTE: there is no requirement that you have to invest in either of the companies). Give justification as to why you are interested in investing in the company (or companies). Understandably, you may not have all the information you want from a due diligence perspective, but based on the information you have been given, analyse each opportunity. Some of the aspects to take into consideration are, but not limited to:
The capability and motivation of the management team
Market demand
Production is scaled up as planned
Competition
Intellectual Property (e.g, is it defendable?)
Liability and litigation
Company has sufficient capital
Existing customers are able and willing to pay
Success Probability Each person on the team will be expected to speak in the presentation. For this assessment, there is a minimum of six (6) references which can include journals, reputable websites, government papers, etc.
Page 2 Kaplan Business School Assessment Outline
Submission mode Face to Face Students You will have 90 minutes in-class to prepare with your team. Your team will have to 10 minutes to
present. Your workshop facilitator will stop you at 10 minutes whether you are finished or not. Online Students You will have 90 minutes in-class (via Zoom) to prepare your 10-minute presentation. Your workshop facilitator will stop your presentation at the 10 minute mark whether you are finished or not.
Important Study Information
Academic Integrity Policy KBS values academic integrity. All students must understand the meaning and consequences of cheating, plagiarism and other academic offences under the Academic Integrity and Conduct Policy. What is academic integrity and misconduct? What are the penalties for academic misconduct? What are the late penalties? How can I appeal my grade? Click here for answers to these questions: http://www.kbs.edu.au/current-students/student-policies/.
Word Limits for Written Assessments Submissions that exceed the word limit by more than 10% will cease to be marked from the point at which that limit is exceeded.
Study Assistance Students may seek study assistance from their local Academic Learning Advisor or refer to the resources on the MyKBS Academic Success Centre page. Click here for this information.
http://www.kbs.edu.au/current-students/student-policies/
https://elearning.kbs.edu.au/course/view.php?id=1481
Page 3 Kaplan Business School Assessment Outline
Assessment Marking Guide
Criteria F (Fail) 0%-49%
P (Pass)
50%-64%
CR (Credit)
65%-74%
D (Distinction)
75% – 84%
HD (High Distinction)
85%-100%
Mark
Assessment Content (Subject Specific) OUT OF 80 MARKS
Introduction Introduction was not included. Introduction was vague. Introduction covered basic overview.
Very good introduction with clear overview.
Excellent introduction with clear and thorough overview.
/ 10
Company #1 Evaluation No evaluation and due diligence of the company.
Vague evaluation and due diligence of the company.
Good evaluation and due diligence of the company. More depth needed.
Very good evaluation and due diligence of the company.
Excellent evaluation and due diligence of the company. Very thorough analysis with justifications.
/ 30
Company #2 Evaluation No evaluation and due diligence of the company.
Vague evaluation and due diligence of the company.
Good evaluation and due diligence of the company. More depth needed.
Very good evaluation and due diligence of the company.
Excellent evaluation and due diligence of the company. Very thorough analysis with justifications.
/ 30
Recommendations / Justification / Conclusion
Recommendations and conclusions were not addressed / included.
Recommendations and conclusions were included but vague.
Recommendations and conclusions were sufficiently addressed.
Very good recommendations and conclusions though could have been clearer.
Excellent and thorough recommendations and conclusions.
/ 10
Structure Format and Presentation (Consistent across all courses) OUT OF 20 MARKS
Answer clearly and logically presented
Writing style is unclear; lacks logical flow and structure
Writing style lacks some clarity; some flaws in logical flow and structure
Writing style is mostly clear; Generally logical flow and structure
Answer presented mostly clear and logical
Answer presented very clear and logical.
/ 4
Appropriate theory and research used to answer question posed
Inappropriate and outdated theory and research used
Adequate theory and research used; Some research dated. Met minimum standards,
Good theory and research used. Current. Could have had more in-depth research.
Very good and in-depth theory and research used; current and thorough.
Excellent and current theory and research used; Depth of research exceeded expectations
/ 4
Correct academic writing style used, including correct spelling, grammar and punctuation
Non-academic writing style, lacks clarity and has no flow. No structure. Many spelling and grammatical errors.
Writing style is non-academic though is clear; minor flow and structure issues. Spelling/ grammatical errors.
Academic writing style is clear; good flow, some structure issues. Some spelling or grammatical errors.
Clear academic writing style with very good flow and structure. Minor spelling or grammatical errors.
Academic writing style is very clear with sound flow and structure. No spelling or grammatical errors.
/ 4
Format of answer consistent with question requirements and KBS guidelines
Format of answer does not follow KBS guidelines of the question requirements
Format of answer adequately meets question requirements; KBS guidelines inconsistent
Format of answer meets question requirements and KBS guidelines; some errors
Format of answer consistent with question requirements & KBS guidelines; a couple of errors
Format of answer exceeds question requirements and KBS guidelines; no errors
/ 4
In-text referencing and reference list follows Harvard style and consistent with KBS guidelines
None or very few sources are acknowledged. Does not follow Harvard style nor KBS guidelines.
Acknowledged few sources in text and reference list. Few citations & references follow Harvard style. KBS guidelines rarely adhered to.
Acknowledged some sources in text and reference list. Inconsistent use of Harvard style. Some KBS guidelines adhered to.
Acknowledged most sources in text and reference list. Most citations and references follow Harvard style. Most KBS guidelines adhered to.
Acknowledged all sources in text and reference list. All citations and references follow Harvard style. All KBS guidelines adhered to.
/ 4
Comments:
/100
Applied Sciences
Architecture and Design
Biology
Business & Finance
Chemistry
Computer Science
Geography
Geology
Education
Engineering
English
Environmental science
Spanish
Government
History
Human Resource Management
Information Systems
Law
Literature
Mathematics
Nursing
Physics
Political Science
Psychology
Reading
Science
Social Science
Home
Blog
Archive
Essay
Reviews
Contact
google+twitterfacebook
Copyright © 2019 HomeworkMarket.com
