Politically Exposed Persons and Enhanced Due Diligence Questions
Who are “Politically Exposed Persons” (PEPs) and why is it important to implement effective risk-based due diligence, monitoring, and reporting systems for this group?
Why must an individual’s official responsibilities of his office be considered when determining if the individual is a PEP?
Explain why it is necessary to review an individual’s financial information, professional background, and income sources when determining his PEP status.
What role does geographic location and industry play in determining PEP risk?
What does FATF Recommendation 6 state? Why do you think that compliance with this FATF Recommendation is so low/poor?
Why is applying Enhanced Due Diligence (EDD) measures to all former office holders and their families and close associates for an infinite time disproportionate?
Hypo: you are an attorney and a prospective client (American individual) informs you that he has been cheated out of $75,000 in a Nigerian fraud scheme. What practical, legal problems will you encounter in handling the case? You find out later that there are ten different unrelated victims.
Hypo: you are an attorney and a large multinational bank informs you that it has been cheated out of 4.5 million dollars in a multinational fraud scheme with the monies ending up in Nigeria, Cyprus, and Yemen. How will you handle the case?
Please comment on and discuss the Termites article.
“Place your order now for a similar assignment and have exceptional work written by our team of experts, guaranteeing you A results.”
Attachments
20190529181943schrothjlsb_vol12_art1_schroth (323 kB)
20190529182202incsr_vol_incsr_vol._2_pdf (2 MB)
