Group of Intelligent, Experienced Researchers Reflection Lab Case Scenario

apa format, in cite qoutes and reference page.
Step 1: Case Scenario
Read the following case first; then proceed to the next steps.
You work at a research lab and are 1 of the 6 researchers. Philip, awell-known and highly respected scientist in the lab has offered atheory that the cholesterol in eggs can have serious negative healtheffects on children. He cites 5 case studies done in different regionsof the country over a two-year period and all studies suggest thatnegative health issues can be linked to egg consumption. Hispresentation is very compelling and the research lab has been offeredsignificant amounts of government grant money to promote the findings ofthe cholesterol study.
The lab goes forward with the cholesterol research and assigns theother 5 researchers the task of furthering the study. After one year ofresearch and much economic success for everyone at the research lab, ameeting is convened to assess the progress of the program. At thismeeting, Rose, a second scientist with a long history of field researchexperience offers the theory that while there could be a relationaleffect of the cholesterol in eggs to children, she argues that there isno causal relationship and these findings should be published. The groupis stunned as no one has ever challenged Philip’s work and his previousstudies on other areas have all been accepted by the scientificcommunity. Rose is excoriated by the group and is told by the researchlab that Philip’s reputation speaks for itself and her study is notcredible and will not be pursued. Two years later, a rival lab provesRose’s theory and Philp’s research lab loses all government funding.
Step 2: Reflection Part
Ask yourself:
How can it be that a group of intelligent, experienced researcherswould not explore the possibility of another theory in their study?
What is the importance of dissenting opinions?
Do I listen to and fully understand the point of view of the personexpressing a dissenting opinion, especially if that person is the solevoice in the room.
Do I arrive at my opinion without sufficient critical analysis?
Am I basing my position on assumptions that I presume to be true, but that perhaps are not sufficiently tested or researched?
After you have thought through your position on this scenario, applyyour thinking to this week’s philosophers and complete Step 3 – thewriting part of this assignment.
Step 3: Writing Part
In 2-3 pages, explain how Locke and Rousseau might respond to thiscase of the research lab and groupthink if they were confronted withthis situation. How might they explain majority rule and the socialcontract to illustrate their philosophy in dealing with groupthink?Support your analysis with quotes or paraphrases from the philosophers.Use APA format and citation when writing your assignment.
Submit your completed assignment by following the directions linked below. Please check the Course Calendar for specific due dates.
Save your assignment as a Microsoft Word document. (Mac users, pleaseremember to append the “.docx” extension to the filename.) The name ofthe file should be your first initial and last name, followed by anunderscore and the name of the assignment, and an underscore and thedate. An example is shown below:
Jstudent_exampleproblem_101504
Need Help? Click here for complete drop box instructions.

“Place your order now for a similar assignment and have exceptional work written by our team of experts, guaranteeing you A results.”